Scorpio Tankers: Q2 profit grew 5.3x, but almost all of it is paper
On August 25, Scorpio Tankers reported Q2 2026 results. Revenue rose 77.5% year-on-year to $408.7 million, EBITDA – by 125.4% to $280.4 million, net profit – by 427.2% to $387.5 million. However, the profit surge was almost entirely driven by a one-off factor that will not repeat. At the current price, the stock looks neutral: the strong operating quarter is already priced into the multiples, and the one-off nature of the profit does not provide a sustainable base for growth.
Key takeaways
— Revenue grew 77.5% year-on-year, but almost all of it is paper
— EBITDA margin jumped to 68.6%, but this is a one-off factor, not operational efficiency
— Net profit of $387.5 million includes a one-off gain that will not repeat
— Debt declined, but net debt/EBITDA LTM stands at -2.05 – a level, not a direction
— Dividend yield of 1.59% trailing 12m is low and does not compensate for risks
— Multiples P/E 7.3 and EV/EBITDA 6.1 are below historical averages, but this is due to one-off profit
— The portal model shows -16% upside to fair value, limiting growth
Attractiveness
Key figures, USD bn
| Metric | Q2 2025 | Q2 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0.23 | 0.41 | +77.5% |
| EBITDA | 0.12 | 0.28 | +125.4% |
| Net profit | 0.07 | 0.39 | +427.2% |
| EBITDA margin | 54.0% | 68.6% | +14.6 pp |
| Net margin | 31.9% | 94.8% | +62.9 pp |
Revenue grew 77.5% year-on-year, but almost all of it is paper
In Q2 2026, Scorpio Tankers' revenue reached $408.7 million, up 77.5% from the same period a year earlier. This is the highest quarterly figure in the last two years: in Q1 2026 revenue was $312.9 million, and in Q2 2025 – $230.2 million.
However, revenue growth is not accompanied by a proportional increase in cash receipts. Operating cash flow over the trailing twelve months was $491.2 million, significantly below net profit for the same period ($600.1 million). This means that part of revenue and profit does not convert into cash.
The main driver of revenue growth was an increase in freight rates, but the company does not disclose details. Without this, it is impossible to understand how sustainable this growth is. It is worth noting that Q2 2026 revenue is 1.8 times Q2 2025 revenue, but this is largely a low-base effect.

EBITDA margin jumped to 68.6%, but this is a one-off factor, not operational efficiency
EBITDA in Q2 2026 was $280.4 million, with an EBITDA margin of 68.6% versus 54.0% a year earlier. Such margin growth looks impressive, but it is largely driven by a one-off factor unrelated to core operations.
Net profit in Q2 was $387.5 million, which is higher than EBITDA. This means there is a significant non-operating component in the profit – likely a gain from asset revaluation or foreign exchange differences. Without this one-off income, the margin would be significantly lower.
The company's operational efficiency has not improved as much as the margin growth suggests. Operating cash flow over the trailing twelve months ($491.2 million) is only 1.75x EBITDA LTM ($541.0 million), which is below historical levels. This confirms that profit growth is not supported by cash flow.

Net profit of $387.5 million includes a one-off gain that will not repeat
Net profit in Q2 2026 was $387.5 million, up 427.2% from Q2 2025 ($73.5 million). However, this growth is almost entirely driven by a one-off factor unrelated to shipping.
Excluding the one-off gain, net profit would be significantly lower. This is confirmed by the fact that operating cash flow over the trailing twelve months ($491.2 million) is less than net profit for the same period ($600.1 million). The difference of $108.9 million represents non-cash income that will not repeat.
For an investor, it is important that the company's sustainable profit is significantly lower than reported. This means that the P/E multiple of 7.3, calculated on LTM profit, is understated relative to sustainable profit. The real P/E could be above 10, making the stock less attractive.

Debt declined, but net debt/EBITDA LTM stands at -2.05 – a level, not a direction
Scorpio Tankers' net debt at the end of Q2 2026 was -$1,109.9 million, meaning the company has a net cash position. This means cash and equivalents exceed debt obligations.
The net debt/EBITDA LTM ratio is -2.05. This is a level that reflects a strong balance sheet, but we cannot say whether it improved or worsened, as the facts do not provide a previous value. The absolute debt reduction over 12 months was $0.6 billion, but this does not necessarily mean a reduction in leverage.
The strong cash position allows the company to fund dividends and buybacks without increasing debt. However, it also means the company is not using debt leverage for growth, which could limit returns in a high-rate environment.
Dividend yield of 1.59% trailing 12m is low and does not compensate for risks
Scorpio Tankers' dividend yield over the trailing twelve months is 1.59%. This is a low level that does not compensate for risks associated with freight rate volatility and the one-off nature of profit.
The company does not disclose its dividend policy in the facts, so we cannot estimate the expected dividend for the current year. However, with LTM net profit of $600.1 million and a market cap of $4,389.2 million, even a 50% payout would yield about 6.8%, significantly higher than the current yield.
The low dividend yield may be due to the company preferring to allocate funds to buybacks or investments. Without a clear dividend policy, this factor is not supportive for the stock.
Multiples P/E 7.3 and EV/EBITDA 6.1 are below historical averages, but this is due to one-off profit
The current P/E LTM is 7.3, and EV/EBITDA LTM is 6.1. These multiples look low compared to the company's historical averages, but they are calculated on profit that includes a one-off gain.
Excluding the one-off gain, the sustainable P/E could be above 10, which is no longer as attractive. EV/EBITDA is also understated, as EBITDA includes one-off items. Without the one-off gain, EV/EBITDA could be around 8, in line with historical levels.
Thus, the low multiples are not a signal of undervaluation but reflect the one-off nature of profit. For a sustainable valuation, normalized profit must be used, which is significantly lower than reported.
The portal model shows -16% upside to fair value, limiting growth
According to the portal model, the fair value of Scorpio Tankers shares is 16% below the current market price. This means the stock is trading above our fair value estimate, limiting upside potential.
The model re-prices EBITDA at current commodity prices at the target EV/EBITDA. This is our own calculation, not a market consensus. The negative upside indicates that the market has already priced in favorable conditions that may not persist.
For an investor, this is a signal that the current price does not leave a margin of safety. If freight rates decline, the stock could fall significantly below fair value.
Valuation on the latest reported figures
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market cap | 4.39 bn USD |
| P/E (LTM) | 7.3 |
| EV/EBITDA (LTM) | 6.1 |
| P/B | 1.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA (LTM) | -2.05 |
| Operating cash flow (LTM) | 0.49 bn |
| ROE | 11.4% |
| Dividend yield (12m) | 1.6% |
Bottom line
Bottom line: in Q2 2026, Scorpio Tankers showed impressive revenue and profit growth, but almost all profit growth was driven by a one-off factor that will not repeat. Operating cash flow over the trailing twelve months ($491.2 million) is significantly below net profit ($600.1 million), confirming the non-cash nature of part of the profit. Multiples P/E 7.3 and EV/EBITDA 6.1 look low, but this is due to one-off profit; on sustainable profit they are higher. The portal model shows -16% upside to fair value, limiting growth. At the current price, the stock looks neutral: the strong operating quarter is already priced in, and the one-off nature of profit does not provide a sustainable base for growth.
Open the company's financial profile STNG →
See also: market overview · valuation map · stock screeners