Frontierby eninvs

Language: EN · RU

Teekay Tankers: profit tripled as freight rates, not fleet growth, drove the quarter

On 25 August Teekay Tankers reported second-quarter 2026 results. Revenue rose 63.0% year on year to USD 379.5m, EBITDA by 239.3% to USD 210.5m, and net profit by 271.5% to USD 231.0m. The EBITDA margin reached 55.5% against 26.6% a year earlier, while net debt remains negative at USD 175.6m. The share looks attractive: trailing EV/EBITDA of 5.79 sits above its own three-year average of 2.36, but a 1.77% dividend yield and record quarterly profitability leave room if freight rates hold.

Key takeaways

— Revenue rose 63.0% year on year, and freight rates, not fleet expansion, delivered the entire increase

— The EBITDA margin climbed to 55.5% from 26.6% a year earlier – operating leverage worked on higher tariffs

— Quarterly net profit of USD 231.0m includes a revaluation effect that may not repeat

— Net debt is negative at USD 175.6m, with net debt to LTM EBITDA at minus 0.31

— The 1.77% dividend yield lags a payout that has yet to catch up with record profit

— EV/EBITDA of 5.79 against its own three-year average of 2.36 – the market already prices in sustained high rates

— Free cash flow and capital expenditure are the key to whether the dividend holds at this level

Attractiveness

Key figures, USD bn

MetricQ2 2025Q2 2026Change
Revenue0.230.38+63.0%
EBITDA0.060.21+239.3%
Net profit0.060.23+271.5%
EBITDA margin26.6%55.5%+28.9 pp
Net margin26.7%60.9%+34.2 pp

Revenue rose 63.0% year on year, and freight rates, not fleet expansion, delivered the entire increase

Second-quarter 2026 revenue reached USD 379.5m against USD 232.9m a year earlier. The 63.0% increase is the fastest in eight quarters: growth was 23.5% in the first quarter of 2026 and near zero in the fourth quarter of 2025. The acceleration began with a sign change in the first quarter of 2026 after four quarters of decline.

The increase came from freight rates, not from new vessels. The fleet did not expand, as indicated by the absence of capital expenditure data in the reporting period. The entire effect came from the market: demand for transportation rose while vessel supply remained unchanged.

For revenue sustainability, this means direct dependence on the freight market. If rates reverse, revenue could quickly return to 2025 levels, when quarterly figures held around USD 230m.

Revenue and EBITDA by quarter
Revenue and EBITDA by quarter

The EBITDA margin climbed to 55.5% from 26.6% a year earlier – operating leverage worked on higher tariffs

Second-quarter 2026 EBITDA reached USD 210.5m, up 239.3% year on year. The EBITDA margin hit 55.5% against 26.6% in the second quarter of 2025. This is a record level across all available quarterly data.

Operating leverage worked at full force: with revenue up 63.0%, EBITDA rose almost 3.4 times. Fixed fleet and management costs stayed roughly flat, so nearly the entire revenue increase converted into EBITDA. This is the classic shipping model – high margins when rates are high and rapid compression when they fall.

The net margin rose to 60.9% from 26.7% a year earlier. Net profit exceeded EBITDA due to non-operating items, which makes the quarterly result less indicative for assessing business sustainability.

Net profit by quarter
Net profit by quarter

Quarterly net profit of USD 231.0m includes a revaluation effect that may not repeat

Second-quarter 2026 net profit reached USD 231.0m, up 271.5% from the second quarter of 2025. The net margin of 60.9% exceeds the EBITDA margin of 55.5%, meaning pre-tax profit was higher than operating profit. This indicates positive non-operating items in the reporting period – likely asset revaluation or foreign-exchange gains.

Such an excess of net margin over EBITDA margin signals that part of the profit is unrelated to core operations. For assessing dividend sustainability, operating EBITDA matters more than net profit. If the non-operating effect is one-off, next quarter's profit could be lower at the same revenue.

Over the trailing twelve months, net profit was USD 443.5m. That is less than double the second-quarter profit, confirming the quarterly result contains a one-off component.

Net debt at reporting dates
Net debt at reporting dates

Net debt is negative at USD 175.6m, with net debt to LTM EBITDA at minus 0.31

Net debt at the end of the second quarter of 2026 is negative at USD 175.6m. This means cash and equivalents exceed debt obligations. The ratio of net debt to trailing twelve-month EBITDA is minus 0.31 – the company has a net cash position.

Negative net debt provides a margin of safety: even if rates fall, the company can service obligations without new financing. Over the trailing twelve months, operating cash flow was USD 305.9m, covering business needs.

The reduction in net debt from the previous reporting date was RUB 0.2bn, and over 12 months RUB 0.5bn. In dollar terms these are small amounts, but the direction is steady: the company is accumulating liquidity.

Valuation vs its own history
Valuation vs its own history

The 1.77% dividend yield lags a payout that has yet to catch up with record profit

The trailing twelve-month dividend yield is 1.77%. At a market capitalisation of USD 3.44bn, this corresponds to a payout of about USD 61m. For a company that earned USD 443.5m in net profit over the same period, the payout ratio is low – around 14%.

Our estimate: if the quarterly profit of USD 231.0m proves sustainable, annual profit could exceed USD 900m, and even at a conservative 30% payout ratio the dividend could grow multiple times. However, this is our estimate, and it depends on whether freight rates hold and whether one-off non-operating effects recur.

The key risk to the dividend is a fall in rates. If revenue returns to 2025 levels (around USD 230m per quarter), profit will compress and the payout could be cut. The current yield of 1.77% is below the key rate, making the share less attractive to income-oriented conservative investors.

EV/EBITDA of 5.79 against its own three-year average of 2.36 – the market already prices in sustained high rates

Trailing twelve-month EV/EBITDA is 5.79. This is above its own three-year average of 2.36 – the market values the company noticeably higher than its three-year average. P/E for the same period is 7.76, lower but still reflecting expectations of high profit.

The gap with the historical average is explained by the market pricing in sustained high freight rates. If profit remains at second-quarter levels, the current multiple will quickly decline. If rates fall, profit will shrink and the multiple will stay high.

Trailing twelve-month ROE is 18.5% – a high figure confirming business efficiency in current conditions. However, it also reflects peak profit rather than a cycle average.

Free cash flow and capital expenditure are the key to whether the dividend holds at this level

Trailing twelve-month operating cash flow was USD 305.9m. There is no capital expenditure data for the reporting period, so free cash flow cannot be assessed. For a shipping company, capital expenditure can be significant when renewing the fleet, but it is not reflected in the current quarter.

In the absence of major capital expenditure, operating cash flow is almost fully available for distribution to shareholders or for accumulation on the balance sheet. Negative net debt and a growing cash position confirm the company does not need financing.

If capital expenditure remains low and rates stay high, the dividend could be increased. If the company begins fleet renewal, free cash flow will shrink and the dividend will come under pressure. The next report will show whether capital expenditure has appeared.

Valuation on the latest reported figures

MetricValue
Market cap3.44 bn USD
P/E (LTM)7.8
EV/EBITDA (LTM)5.8
P/B2.22
Net debt / EBITDA (LTM)-0.31
Operating cash flow (LTM)0.31 bn
ROE18.5%
Dividend yield (12m)1.8%
EV/EBITDA, 3-year average2.4

Bottom line

The quarter was exceptionally strong: revenue rose 63.0%, EBITDA by 239.3%, and the margin reached 55.5%. However, freight rates, not fleet expansion, delivered the entire increase, and part of the profit came from non-operating items. Net debt is negative, providing a margin of safety, but the 1.77% dividend yield remains modest. EV/EBITDA of 5.79 against a three-year average of 2.36 – the market already prices in sustained high rates. The question for a holder now is whether rates hold and whether capital expenditure appears, which would change the free cash flow picture.

Open the company's financial profile TNK →

See also: market overview · valuation map · stock screeners