← Company

AU_RRL 2025-12-31 FY — report review

Status: PARTIAL — incomplete — unset metrics listed below; Currency: —; Amounts unit: —; Forms: ✓ ✓ ✓

Report published: Not stored for this period — set financial_report_date on the row (EDGAR filingDate, KASE change_date, or manual_catalog).

PDF: Open the filing PDF (primary document)

To recalculate statement detection and previews from the PDF, use this link The default link runs in the background: a status panel shows phase, elapsed time, rough ETA, CUDA vs CPU, and OOM hints, then loads the finished report. Heavy mode with refresh does this automatically so reverse proxies do not return 502. Add &sync=1 only for one long blocking request (not recommended). You can use ?refresh=1, ?recalc=1, ?nocache=1, or ?recompute=1 on the URL. (block in the browser until done: synchronous refresh)

Default view is fast (metric table + statement page numbers only) so reverse proxies do not time out. Use ?heavy=1 when you need embedded page images and Camelot tables.

Metric mapping (value → extracted evidence)

Metric values use dashboard units where applicable; evidence is the stored snippet from the PDF text layer or OCR used during extraction.

Net debt structure (leases included, IFRS 16)

Statement pages (discovery)

Below: last full statement reconstruction (PDF scans + tables + subtotal checks) cached from a ?heavy=1 run. Open heavy mode to rebuild if the PDF, discovery, or extraction changed. full previews & tables (?heavy=1).

Statement previews & reconstructed tables

Highlights Yellow row = matched stored evidence label; orange cell = exact number used for that metric (hover row for details). Revenue Operating profit D&A EBITDA Net profit cash debt_short debt_long Assets Equity Operating CF Investing CF

Green / amber / red bars on the label column mark subtotal rows where summed detail lines match the reported total (heuristic). The table under each reconstructed grid lists every check (Σ detail vs reported, status).

P&L

Tables and checks run on 2 of 3 PDF pages for this form (timeout budget). Raise REPORT_REVIEW_HEAVY_RECON_PAGES for more.

P&L — PDF page 13

No Camelot table — OCR (v8) below.

v8 OCR page 13: empty rows.

P&L — PDF page 14

Camelot table (pages 14, primary page 14).

#	Joined label	Line item	The Mineral Resource Estimate has…	Column 3
0	Estimation methodology	Estimation methodology
1	The Mineral Resource Estimate has been generated using Ordinary Kriging within wireframed estimation		The Mineral Resource Estimate has been generated using Ordinary Kriging within wireframed estimation
2	domains.	domains.
3	The estimate is based on 1m downhole composites from the resource and underground grade control		The estimate is based on 1m downhole composites from the resource and underground grade
4	datasets.	datasets.
5	Grade estimation was completed in Datamine Studio RM, with detailed statistical and geostatistical		Grade estimation was completed in Datamine Studio RM, with detailed statistical and geos
6	investigations, including variography, completed in Snowden Supervisor 9.		investigations, including variography, completed in Snowden Supervisor 9.
7	High grade cuts were applied to composites on a domain-by-domain basis to limit the influence of outlier		High grade cuts were applied to composites on a domain-by-domain basis to limit the influence of out
8	data.	data.
9	Block dimensions are 5m east by 10m north by 5m elevation, with sub-blocking to 0.625m by 1.25m by		Block dimensions are 5m east by 10m north by 5m elevation, with sub-blocking to 0.625m by 1.25m by
10	2.5m.	2.5m.
11	Cut-off grade(s), including the basis for the selected cut-off grade(s)		Cut-off grade(s), including the basis for the selected cut-off grade(s)
12	The reported Mineral Resource Estimate is reported within Mining Stope Optimiser shapes generated using		The reported Mineral Resource Estimate is reported within Mining Stope Optimiser shapes generated us
13	a 1.5g/t Au cut-off.	a 1.5g/t Au cut-off.
14	The 1.5g/t cut-off grade was determined in conjunction with mining engineers to represent a reasonable		The 1.5g/t cut-off grade was determined in conjunction with mining engineers to represent a reasonab
15	mining cut-off for longhole open stoping.	mining cut-off for longhole open stoping.
16	Deswik Mining Stope Optimiser was used to support demonstration of reasonable prospects for eventual		Deswik Mining Stope Optimiser was used to support demonstration of reasonable prospects for eventual
17	economic extraction, with isolated stope shapes excluded.		economic extraction, with isolated stope shapes excluded.
18	Mining and metallurgical methods and parameters, and other material modifying factors		Mining and metallurgical methods and parameters, and other material modifying factors
19	considered to date.	considered to date.
20	Underground mining is ongoing at Garden Well, having commenced at Garden Well South in late 2022 and		Underground mining is ongoing at Garden Well, having commenced at Garden Well South in late 2022 and
21	at Garden Well Main in late 2025, and this operating experience helps inform the appropriateness of the		at Garden Well Main in late 2025, and this operating experience helps inform the appropriateness of
22	mining and other modifying factors applied.	mining and other modifying factors applied.
23	Longhole open stoping is the assumed mining method, with Mining Stope Optimiser parameters agreed		Longhole open stoping is the assumed mining method, with Mining Stope Optimiser parameters agreed
24	with mining engineers. Dilution inside Mining Stope Optimiser shapes is included in the Mineral Resource,		with mining engineers. Dilution inside Mining Stope Optimiser shapes is included in the Mineral Reso
25	but no allowance has been made for pillars, additional mining ore loss and dilution or development ore.		but no allowance has been made for pillars, additional mining ore loss and dilution or development o
26	The reported Mineral Resources are stated within Mining Stope Optimisation shapes generated using a		The reported Mineral Resources are stated within Mining Stope Optimisation shapes generated using a
27	1.5g/t cut-off, minimum mining width of 2.0m, dilution of 1.0m on the hanging wall and 0.5m on the footwall,		1.5g/t cut-off, minimum mining width of 2.0m, dilution of 1.0m on the hanging wall and 0.5m on the f
28	minimum strike length of 5m and maximum strike length of 20m.		minimum strike length of 5m and maximum strike length of 20m.
29	A gold recovery of 90% has been adopted based on feasibility metallurgical test work, production data and		A gold recovery of 90% has been adopted based on feasibility metallurgical test work, production dat
30	ongoing test work.	ongoing test work.
31	It is assumed that current or similar operational approaches, protocols and facilities applied to	It is assumed	that current or similar operational approaches, protocols and	facilities applied to
32	environmental factors at Garden Well will continue for the duration of the project		environmental factors at Garden Well will continue for the duration of the project
33	Ore Reserves	Ore Reserves
34	Material Assumptions	Material Assumptions
35	The Ore Reserve is based on a feasibility-level study completed for the underground mine. The study draws		The Ore Reserve is based on a feasibility-level study completed for the underground mine. The study
36	on existing surface mining operating experience at Garden Well, including Mineral Resource reconciliation		on existing surface mining operating experience at Garden Well, including Mineral Resource reconcili
37	and metallurgical recovery performance, with actual processing and general and administrative costs		and metallurgical recovery performance, with actual processing and general and administrat
38	available. Regis Resources engaged third parties to complete geotechnical, hydrogeological and	available. Regis Resources engaged	third parties	to complete geotechnical, hydrogeological and
39	metallurgical test work to support the study.	metallurgical test work to support the study.
40	Revenue assumptions were based on a gold price of A$3,500/oz.		Revenue assumptions were based on a gold price of A$3,500/oz.
41	The study included suitable Modifying Factors and concluded that the project is technically feasible and		The study included suitable Modifying Factors and concluded that the project is technically feasible
42	economically viable.	economically viable.
43	Classification Criteria	Classification Criteria
44	Probable Ore Reserves have been derived from Indicated Mineral Resources only.	Probable Ore Reserves have been derived from Indicated Mineral Resources only.
45	No Measured Mineral Resource is included in the Ore Reserve estimate.	No Measured Mineral Resource is included in the Ore Reserve estimate.
46	No Inferred Mineral Resources were included in the Ore Reserve.	No Inferred Mineral Resources were included in the Ore Reserve.
47	The Ore Reserve classification reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit and the confidence in	The Ore Reserve classification reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit and the confidenc
48	the Modifying Factors applied.	the Modifying Factors applied.

No subtotal/total rows matched the built-in patterns on this table (or fewer than two detail lines above each candidate).

BS

Tables and checks run on 2 of 3 PDF pages for this form (timeout budget). Raise REPORT_REVIEW_HEAVY_RECON_PAGES for more.

BS — PDF page 21

No Camelot table — OCR (v8) below.

v8 OCR page 21: empty rows.

BS — PDF page 22

Camelot table (pages 22, primary page 22).

#	Joined label	Line item	31 December 2025	Type → Open-Pit	Cut-Off → (g/t)	Tonnes → (Mt)	Measured → Gold	Gold → Metal	Tonnes → (Mt)	Indicated → Gold	Gold → Metal	Tonnes → (Mt)
0	MINERAL RESOURCE AND ORE RESERVE TABLES	MINERAL RESOURCE AND ORE RESERVE TABLES
1	Group Mineral Resources as at 31 December 2025 (Regis attributable, inclusive of Ore Reserves)		Group Mineral Resources as at 31 December 2025 (Regis attributable, inclusive of Ore Reserves)
2	Measured Indicated						Measured			Indicated
3	Cut-Off				Cut-Off
4	Project Equity Type Gold Gold Gold Gold	Project	Equity	Type			Gold	Gold		Gold	Gold
5	(g/t) Tonnes Tonnes				(g/t)	Tonnes			Tonnes			Tonnes
6	Grade Metal Grade Metal						Grade	Metal		Grade	Metal
7	(Mt) (Mt)					(Mt)			(Mt)			(Mt)
8	(g/t) (koz) (g/t) (koz)						(g/t)	(koz)		(g/t)	(koz)
9	Duketon North2 100% Open-Pit 0.4 - - - 39 0.9 1,140	Duketon North2	100%	Open-Pit	0.4	-	-	-	39	0.9	1,140	9
10	Duketon North 100% Stockpiles - 1 0.5 10 - - -	Duketon North	100%	Stockpiles	-	1	0.5	10	-	-	-	-
11	Duketon North 100% Sub Total 1 0.5 10 39 0.9 1,140	Duketon North	100%	Sub Total		1	0.5	10	39	0.9	1,140	9
12	Duketon South3/4 100%4 Open-Pit 0.4 0 1.1 - 25 1.2 940	Duketon South3/4	100%4	Open-Pit	0.4	0	1.1	-	25	1.2	940	5
13	Duketon South5 100% Underground 1.8 2 2.6 200 12 2.3 870	Duketon South5	100%	Underground	1.8	2	2.6	200	12	2.3	870	4
14	Duketon South 100% Stockpiles - 6 0.5 110 - - -	Duketon South	100%	Stockpiles	-	6	0.5	110	-	-	-	-
15	Duketon South 100%4 Sub Total 9 1.1 310 37 1.5 1,810	Duketon South	100%4	Sub Total		9	1.1	310	37	1.5	1,810	9
16	Duketon Deposits 100%4 Total 9 1.1 320 77 1.2 2,950	Duketon Deposits	100%4	Total		9	1.1	320	77	1.2	2,950	18
17	Tropicana6 30% Open-Pit 0.3/0.4 1 1.4 30 4 1.9 220	Tropicana6	30%	Open-Pit	0.3/0.4	1	1.4	30	4	1.9	220	-
18	Tropicana6 30% Underground 1.6 4 2.6 350 5 2.7 400	Tropicana6	30%	Underground	1.6	4	2.6	350	5	2.7	400	7
19	Tropicana6 30% Stockpiles - 6 0.5 100 - - -	Tropicana6	30%	Stockpiles	-	6	0.5	100	-	-	-	-
20	Tropicana 30% Total 11 1.4 480 8 2.3 620	Tropicana	30%	Total		11	1.4	480	8	2.3	620	7
21	McPhillamys 100% Open-Pit 0.35 - - - 61 1.0 2,070	McPhillamys	100%	Open-Pit	0.35	-	-	-	61	1.0	2,070	8
22	Discovery Ridge 100% Open-Pit 0.4 - - - 2 1.8 140	Discovery Ridge	100%	Open-Pit	0.4	-	-	-	2	1.8	140	6
23	NSW Deposits 100% Total - - - 64 1.1 2,210	NSW Deposits	100%	Total		-	-	-	64	1.1	2,210	14
24	Regis Total Total 20 1.2 790 149 1.2 5,780	Regis Total		Total		20	1.2	790	149	1.2	5,780	40
25	Notes	Notes

No subtotal/total rows matched the built-in patterns on this table (or fewer than two detail lines above each candidate).

CF

Tables and checks run on 2 of 3 PDF pages for this form (timeout budget). Raise REPORT_REVIEW_HEAVY_RECON_PAGES for more.

CF — PDF page 8

No Camelot table — OCR (v8) below.

GPU v8 OCR — page 8 (13 rows). Blank amount cells are normal for section headers and line-wrapped captions; 0 from OCR on those rows is not a reported financial zero. Amounts follow the PDF header (often thousands of currency).

#	Joined label	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5	Column 6
0	SOUTHERN STAR INITIAL RESOURCE
1	The Southern Star deposit, acquired by Regis in July 20256, forms part of Regis' Duketon South operations
2	and sits along the Rosemont-Ben Hur structural trend in the Duketon Greenstone Belt of Western Australia_
3	This is the same highly productive shear zone that hosts the Rosemont underground mine and Ben Hur
4	open pit. Located approximately 3.5 kilometres south of the Ben Hur open pit, the deposit exhibits
5	mineralisation consistent in style and host geology with the adjacent Ben Hur and Rosemont deposits_
6	Following acquisition, Regis undertook a significant program of review, validation and verification of the
7	exploration data and drilling database Regis is pleased to present today an initial Mineral Resource
8	Estimate for Southern Star , prepared in accordance with the JORC Code 2012. Regis will continue to
9	evaluate Southern Star's potential to support a future ORE, in line with its successful strategy of Resource
10	and Reserve ounce replacement across the Duketon operations_
11	Table 3: Southern Star Mineral Resource Estimate as at 31 December 2025
12	Total	62	0.2	1.4	1.9	69

CF — PDF page 9

Camelot table (pages 9, primary page 9).

#	Joined label	Line item
0	Resources	Resources
1	To satisfy “reasonable prospects for eventual extraction” (JORC Code 2012) the assumptions for each of	To satisfy “reasonable prospects for eventual extraction” (JORC Code 2012) the assumptions for each
2	the main areas are summarised below.	the main areas are summarised below.
3	Regis Resources Duketon open pit MREs are constrained by optimised open pit shells developed with	Regis Resources Duketon open pit MREs are constrained by optimised open pit shells deve
4	reasonable operating costs and a long-term gold price assumption of $3,900/oz. A block cut-off of 0.4g/t is	reasonable operating costs and a long-term gold price assumption of $3,900/oz. A block cut-off of 0.
5	applied to all the Regis managed open pits. The prior MRE used a $3,300/oz gold price assumption and a	applied to all the Regis managed open pits. The prior MRE used a $3,300/oz gold price assumption and
6	0.4g/t cut-off grade, with the change adding approximately 10% to the current MRE compared to the prior	0.4g/t cut-off grade, with the change adding approximately 10% to the current MRE compared to the pr
7	year.	year.
8	Duketon underground MREs are reported within volumes created through a Mineable Shape Optimiser	Duketon underground MREs are reported within volumes created through a Mineable Shape Op
9	(MSO) process. The MSO volumes undergo a filtering process to remove stranded optimised volumes,	(MSO) process. The MSO volumes undergo a filtering process to remove stranded optimised
10	which have no reasonable prospect of being mined. The underground MRE is reported externally to the	which have no reasonable prospect of being mined. The underground MRE is reported externally to the
11	open pit MRE pit designs/optimisation shells and takes account of mining depletion and sterilisation. The	open pit MRE pit designs/optimisation shells and takes account of mining depletion and sterilisation
12	mining cut-off of 1.5g/t (prior year, 1.8g/t) was standardised across all the Duketon underground mines,	mining cut-off of 1.5g/t (prior year, 1.8g/t) was standardised across all the Duketon underground mi
13	with appropriate stope geometry applied to reflect conceptual mining techniques. The cut-off grade was	with appropriate stope geometry applied to reflect conceptual mining techniques. The cut-off grade
14	selected on the basis of an assumed top marginal gold price of $3,500/oz while also reflecting improved	selected on the basis of an assumed top marginal gold price of $3,500/oz while also reflecting impro
15	understanding of the operational geometry of the deposit, with greater continuity of mining fronts at 1.5g/t.	understanding of the operational geometry of the deposit, with greater continuity of mining fronts a
16	There have been no material changes to the McPhillamys Resource since the MRE reported to the market	There have been no material changes to the McPhillamys Resource since the MRE reported to the market
17	in 2023 7.	in 2023 7.
18	The Regis Resources portion of the Tropicana Mineral Resource Estimate was reported to the ASX in a	The Regis Resources portion of the Tropicana Mineral Resource Estimate was reported to the ASX in a
19	release on 23 February 2026 titled “Tropicana Underground Ore Reserve Growth Continues”.	release on 23 February 2026 titled “Tropicana Underground Ore Reserve Growth Continues”.
20	Reserves	Reserves
21	Ore Reserves were estimated based on the following cut-off grade assumptions to demonstrate a positive	Ore Reserves were estimated based on the following cut-off grade assumptions to demonstrate a positi
22	economic outcome.	economic outcome.
23	Duketon Open Pits were evaluated at a 0.5g/t cut-off grade for the majority of pits, with slightly lower cut off	Duketon Open Pits were evaluated at a 0.5g/t cut-off grade for the majority of pits, with slightly l
24	grades of 0.4 g/t for softer oxide material reduced operating costs. Reported open pit cut-off grades are a	grades of 0.4 g/t for softer oxide material reduced operating costs. Reported open pit cut-off grade
25	weighted average of the various cut-off grades used at each operation. These vary depending on	weighted average of the various cut-off grades used at each operation. These vary depen
26	metallurgical recoveries, the cost of processing the material and the cost of haulage for satellite deposits.	metallurgical recoveries, the cost of processing the material and the cost of haulage for satellite
27	The top marginal cost per ounce from the open pits varies by deposit, with Duketon North open pits	The top marginal cost per ounce from the open pits varies by deposit, with Duketon No
28	generally evaluated at a higher cost per ounce assumption. This reflects Regis decision to restart the idled	generally evaluated at a higher cost per ounce assumption. This reflects Regis decision to restart t
29	Moolart Well processing plant and recover these ounces in a high gold price environment, without displacing	Moolart Well processing plant and recover these ounces in a high gold price environment, without dis
30	higher margin ore from the Duketon South plants. Across the consolidated Duketon open pits, the average	higher margin ore from the Duketon South plants. Across the consolidated Duketon open pits, the aver
31	top marginal cost per ounce for the current ORE is $3,150/oz.	top marginal cost per ounce for the current ORE is $3,150/oz.
32	Duketon underground operations are reported within MSO volumes representing a cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t,	Duketon underground operations are reported within MSO volumes representing a cut-off grade of 1.5 g
33	at a top marginal cost per ounce of $3,500/oz. The cut-off grade has been revised from last year, when it	at a top marginal cost per ounce of $3,500/oz. The cut-off grade has been revised from last year, wh
34	was 1.8 g/t, with the top marginal cost unchanged.	was 1.8 g/t, with the top marginal cost unchanged.
35	At Tropicana, the Underground Ore Reserve is reported within MSO volumes representing a cut-off grade	At Tropicana, the Underground Ore Reserve is reported within MSO volumes representing a cut-off grad
36	of 2.1g/t Au for Boston Shaker, 1.8g/t for Tropicana and 2.5g/t for Havana. Metal prices and foreign	of 2.1g/t Au for Boston Shaker, 1.8g/t for Tropicana and 2.5g/t for Havana. Metal pr
37	exchange rate between the Australian dollar ($A) and United States dollar ($US) are critical for the	exchange rate between the Australian dollar ($A) and United States dollar ($US) are cri
38	economic evaluation and reporting of OREs and MREs and establishing reporting cut offs. A gold price for	economic evaluation and reporting of OREs and MREs and establishing reporting cut offs. A gold price
39	MREs of US$2,000/oz (A$3,030/oz) and OREs of US$1,700/oz (A$2,576/oz is used for 2025 and set by	MREs of US$2,000/oz (A$3,030/oz) and OREs of US$1,700/oz (A$2,576/oz is used for 2025 and set by
40	AngloGold Ashanti plc).	AngloGold Ashanti plc).
41	The primary economic test for all Reserves is on a site-based cash flow basis, and includes all forecast	The primary economic test for all Reserves is on a site-based cash flow basis, and includes all fore
42	capital required in the operational plan. All open pit ore reserve estimates are reported within detailed pit	capital required in the operational plan. All open pit ore reserve estimates are reported within det
43	designs. Underground ore reserves are reported within mineable underground shapes, with costs and cash	designs. Underground ore reserves are reported within mineable underground shapes, with costs and ca
44	flows assessed on a level-by-level basis.	flows assessed on a level-by-level basis.

No subtotal/total rows matched the built-in patterns on this table (or fewer than two detail lines above each candidate).

Formulas used

• Net debt: debt_short + debt_long + other_financial_liabilities + non_controlling_interest − cash (mln); same-date sibling row (instant BS value; cross-period fill)
• EBITDA: EBITDA = operating_profit + D&A (D&A=0.0; pipeline: extract_da_values → [DA] not found; default 0)