Frontierby eninvs

Language: EN / RU

← All research
Dark theme

Winbond Electronics: revenue up 3.8-fold, yet the discount to its own history is still wide

Contents

Winbond Electronics reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of TWD 82,330.8m, up 278.2% year on year, with EBITDA of TWD 51,781.1m and net profit of TWD 35,421.9m. Growth accelerated from the 184.7% seen in the second quarter, and the EBITDA margin reached 62.9% against 32.4% a year earlier. Net debt turned into a net cash position of TWD 31,354.1m, while the EV/EBITDA multiple of 5.4x sits 74% below its own three-year average. Our verdict: rather attractive – the portal model puts the upside to fair value at +17%. Our view: the share is rather attractive at the current price; upside on the portal model +17%.

Our view: is there upside

Our view in numbers

MetricOur read
VerdictRather attractive
Upside on the portal model+17%
How the model worksfundamental value-creation model: EBITDA growth times the target multiple, against market cap
EV/EBITDA now and 3-year average5.4 vs 20.7 – a 74% discount to its history
Dividend yield, 12m0.4%
Net debt / EBITDA-0.26 – net cash
Strongest case forEV/EBITDA of 5.4x is a 74% discount to its own three-year average of 20.7, with net cash of TWD 31,354.1m and accelerating revenue growth.
Strongest case againstThe 62.9% EBITDA margin may prove to be a peak: at that level any fall in memory prices would hit profit harder than revenue.
What would change the viewThe verdict would drop a step if the EBITDA margin falls below 40% next quarter, showing that the 62.9% level was a one-off.

Key takeaways

— Revenue rose 3.8-fold, and the acceleration has now run for three quarters

— EBITDA margin climbed to 62.9%, and operating leverage supplied almost all of it

— Net profit rose 12-fold, with no one-off items disclosed in the report

— Free cash flow covered capex, and net debt turned into a net cash position

— A dividend yield of 0.37% is too small to sway the verdict

— EV/EBITDA of 5.4x is a 74% discount to its own three-year average

Key figures, TWD bn

MetricQ3 2025Q3 2026Change
Revenue21.882.3+278.2%
EBITDA7.0551.8+634.7%
Operating profit3.7344.0+1080.4%
Net profit2.9435.4+1103.5%
Operating cash flow2.8445.9+1517.1%
Capex—-16.1—
EBITDA margin32.4%62.9%+30.5 pp
Net margin13.5%43.0%+29.5 pp

Revenue rose 3.8-fold, and the acceleration has now run for three quarters

Third-quarter 2026 revenue came to TWD 82,330.8m, up 278.2% year on year. Growth accelerated: it was 184.7% in the second quarter and 91.3% in the first. This is the third consecutive acceleration in year-on-year terms, and each step is markedly larger than the last.

In absolute terms, quarterly revenue rose from TWD 21,770.5m in the third quarter of 2025 to TWD 82,330.8m, nearly a fourfold increase. The sequential move is just as striking: revenue was TWD 59,843.3m in the second quarter of 2026, so it added more than TWD 22bn in a single quarter.

Trailing-twelve-month revenue reached TWD 207,100.0m. That is the base for the multiples, and it is 2.5 times the full-year 2025 revenue obtained by summing the four quarters of last year. Accelerating revenue growth is the central fact of the report, and all three recent quarters confirm it.

Revenue and EBITDA by quarter

PeriodMeasurebn TWD
Q1 2025Revenue19.992617
Q2 2025Revenue21.017957
Q3 2025Revenue21.770523000000015
Q4 2025Revenue26.625074
Q1 2026Revenue38.253064
Q2 2026Revenue59.843265
Q3 2026Revenue82.330805
Q1 2025EBITDA2.3080190000000003
Q2 2025EBITDA1.9405849999999998
Q3 2025EBITDA6.855136000000002
Q4 2025EBITDA7.236826
Q1 2026EBITDA15.759215
Q2 2026EBITDA32.51228
Q3 2026EBITDA51.615899

EBITDA margin

PeriodMeasure%
Q1 2025EBITDA margin11.5
Q2 2025EBITDA margin9.2
Q3 2025EBITDA margin31.5
Q4 2025EBITDA margin27.2
Q1 2026EBITDA margin41.2
Q2 2026EBITDA margin54.3
Q3 2026EBITDA margin62.7

EBITDA margin climbed to 62.9%, and operating leverage supplied almost all of it

Third-quarter 2026 EBITDA was TWD 51,781.1m, a margin of 62.9% against 32.4% a year earlier. That is a gain of 30.5 percentage points, and operating leverage explains almost all of it: revenue rose 3.8-fold while operating profit went from TWD 3,729.1m to TWD 44,019.4m, an 11.8-fold increase.

Operating profit grew faster than revenue because fixed costs were spread over a much larger sales volume. An EBITDA margin of 62.9% means each additional billion of revenue brings about TWD 629m of EBITDA, provided the cost structure holds.

Trailing-twelve-month EBITDA reached TWD 119,721.2m. With a market capitalisation of TWD 607,500.0m and net cash of TWD 31,354.1m, EV/EBITDA LTM is 5.4x. The LTM margin is not disclosed as a separate line, but the quarterly trend shows that 62.9% is not a one-off spike but the result of three consecutive quarters of rising utilisation.

Net profit by quarter

PeriodMeasurebn TWD
Q1 2025Net profit−1.091142
Q2 2025Net profit−1.312433
Q3 2025Net profit2.94315
Q4 2025Net profit3.422354
Q1 2026Net profit10.11431
Q2 2026Net profit24.317031999999998
Q3 2026Net profit35.4219

Net profit rose 12-fold, with no one-off items disclosed in the report

Third-quarter 2026 net profit was TWD 35,421.9m against TWD 2,943.2m a year earlier, a rise of 1,103.5%. The net margin climbed to 43.0% from 13.5%. Profit grew faster than revenue because the operating margin widened more than other lines contracted.

No one-off items appear in the disclosed data. That means the profit came from operations rather than from asset sales or revaluations. Trailing-twelve-month net profit was TWD 73,275.6m, and with a market capitalisation of TWD 607,500.0m the P/E LTM is 8.3x.

Return on equity over the last twelve months was 24.7%. That is a high figure for a memory manufacturer, reflecting a combination of strong margins and moderate capital. The question is how durable the profit level is: at a 62.9% EBITDA margin, any fall in utilisation or prices would hit profit disproportionately hard.

Net debt

at each reporting date, current net debt / EBITDA (LTM) = -0.26

PeriodMeasurebn TWD
Q1 2025Net debt40.498783
Q2 2025Net debt40.980151
Q4 2025Net debt36.396215
Q1 2026Net debt48.834608
Q2 2026Net debt25.625619999999998
Q3 2026Net debt−31.354135

Free cash flow covered capex, and net debt turned into a net cash position

Third-quarter 2026 operating cash flow was TWD 45,868.2m. Capital expenditure in the same quarter was TWD 16,071.1m, so free cash flow after investment stayed firmly positive. Over the last twelve months operating cash flow reached TWD 87,056.6m.

Net debt at 30 September 2026 was minus TWD 31,354.1m, i.e. a net cash position of TWD 31,354.1m. A year earlier, at 30 June 2025, net debt stood at TWD 40,980.2m, and at 30 June 2026 it was TWD 25,625.6m. Over the twelve months to the end of September 2026 net debt moved from TWD 40,980.2m to minus TWD 31,354.1m, a change of TWD 72,334.3m for the better.

The ratio of net debt to LTM EBITDA is minus 0.26, reflecting the net cash position. The company carries no net debt burden, which removes interest-rate risk. Cash flow and the balance sheet are the second pillar of the report after revenue.

Valuation vs its own history

now vs the 3-year average

PeriodMeasure×
EV/EBITDANow5.37829694349233
EV/EBITDA3-year average20.682044226099954

A dividend yield of 0.37% is too small to sway the verdict

The trailing-twelve-month dividend yield is 0.37% on the current price. At a market capitalisation of TWD 607,500.0m that corresponds to payouts of about TWD 2,225m, which is small against LTM net profit of TWD 73,275.6m. The company pays out only a small share of profit.

Our estimate: if the current payout policy holds, the 2026 dividend will stay within a few tenths of a percent in yield terms. Everything hinges on the payout ratio, which is not given in the disclosed data, and on the profit base – with LTM net profit of TWD 73,275.6m, even a generous payout ratio would produce a yield below 1%.

For a holder the dividend is not an argument: a 0.37% yield loses even to the risk-free rate. The main return on the share has to come from growth in business value rather than from payouts. That lowers the appeal for a conservative investor but does not change the assessment for a growth investor.

EV/EBITDA of 5.4x is a 74% discount to its own three-year average

EV/EBITDA LTM is 5.4x against its own three-year average of 20.7. The discount is 74%, and it is the strongest argument for the share. P/E LTM is 8.3x, which looks modest against a 24.7% ROE for a company with such a margin.

The multiple is low not because of debt: net cash of TWD 31,354.1m reduces EV rather than increasing it. The market values the business at 5.4 times annual EBITDA, whereas over the past three years it averaged 20.7. Such a de-rating reflects expectations that the current profit level is not sustainable.

On the portal's model the upside to fair value is +17%. The model sets EBITDA growth against the target multiple and market capitalisation. This is our own estimate, not a market consensus. At a 74% discount to history, even a cautious model produces a double-digit upside.

Valuation on the latest reported figures

MetricValue
Market cap608 bn TWD
P/E (LTM)8.3
EV/EBITDA (LTM)5.4
P/B5.63
Net debt / EBITDA (LTM)-0.26
Operating cash flow (LTM)87.1 bn
ROE24.7%
Dividend yield (12m)0.4%
EV/EBITDA, 3-year average20.7

Bottom line

The strong side of the report is revenue up 3.8-fold and a 62.9% EBITDA margin, which together produced net profit of TWD 35,421.9m. Cash flow and the balance sheet confirm the quality of that profit: operating cash flow of TWD 45,868.2m covered capital expenditure of TWD 16,071.1m, and net debt turned into a net cash position of TWD 31,354.1m. The weak spot is the 0.37% dividend yield, which gives the holder no cash return. The key question for a holder is whether the 62.9% margin holds: that decides whether EV/EBITDA of 5.4x remains a 74% discount to history or turns out to be fair value. Our verdict: rather attractive – the portal model puts the upside to fair value at +17%. Our view: the share is rather attractive at the current price; upside on the portal model +17%.